> licensing for headers under /include. A dual license would work, but > would it also be frowned upon to use just a 3-clause BSD license like we > have in this patch? Thanks. The problem if it is only 3 clause BSD is what happens if somehow somewhere 3 clause BSD and GPL turn out to be incompatible. The easiest way to avoid that is to explicitly put it under both. It's not likely to happen but its also easy to protect against -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
