On Thu, 3 Jun 2010, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > On Thu, 3 Jun 2010, Russell King wrote: > > > > I already covered that in my (ignored) email where I brought up a > > "STD_CONFIG" config symbol, which could be disabled to turn off all > > these additional "select"s. > > I apparently haven't explained myself enough, because what you keep on > harping on is not something I consider acceptable. > > STD_CONFIG is pointless. It's pointless because the solution to what > you call STD_CONFIG would be to just NOT USING the special Kconfig.xyz > file at all. Linus, I think somehow you and Russell are talking past each other. I must admit I don't exactly understand what your suggestion is all about. But I however think that Russell's suggestion makes tons of sense. Care to elaborate on what you dislike about it? What is this Kconfig.xyz you're talking about? How different is it from, say, arch/arm/mach-pxa/Kconfig? If you look into that file, you'll find a bunch of select's which are fundamentally needed for the given targets to boot. This file could be augmented with more conditional select's à la STD_CONFIG as Russell is advocating to actually provide defaults for the drivers that those targets should have by default. Nicolas > So when I suggest special Kconfig files, they are meant to just generate > the templates - ie they'd _generate_ what is currently the defconfig > files. You wouldn't _have_ to use them at all. Sure. a standard "make config" would still produce that .defconfig as usual. Only that you'd have to turn STD_CONFIG off to be offered the choice of enabling/disabling those drivers which are enabled by default otherwise, just like the "make foo_defconfig" is doing now. Nicolas
