On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 12:35:42PM -0700, Daniel Walker wrote: > On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 11:56 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > On Thu, 3 Jun 2010, Russell King wrote: > > > > > > No amount of reorganising the Kconfig files into a heirarchial manner > > > (which they already are) helps. Not one bit. Because they already are. > > > That's not where the problem is. > > > > I don't think you read the whole thread. > > > > Earlier on, I explained exactly what I wanted: just add some "select" > > statements to pickt he things you need per the particular target > > configuration. You seem to have missed that part. > > > > In other words, you _can_ encode the information that is in the > > xyz_defconfig files by doing it in Kconfig.xyz files instead. But you do > > it in a human-readable manner. And the hierarchical thing is absolutely > > required for that - otherwise you'd end up with just another form of the > > current xyz_defconfig. > > > > See? > > > > In other words, you should be able to basically use "make allnoconfig" > > together with a Kconfig.xyz file input to select _exactly_ the pieces you > > need, and nothing else. > > If you did this for drivers, what about disabling a driver? If we used > "select" wouldn't that force all the drivers on without allowing it to > be unselected? I already covered that in my (ignored) email where I brought up a "STD_CONFIG" config symbol, which could be disabled to turn off all these additional "select"s. -- Russell King Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ maintainer of: -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
