On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 6:26 AM Firoz Khan <firoz.khan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> wire up perf_event_open, seccomp, pkey_mprotect, pkey_alloc,
> pkey_free, statx, io_pgetevents and rseq system calls
>
> This require an architecture specific implementation as it not
> present now.
>
> Signed-off-by: Firoz Khan <firoz.khan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/ia64/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/ia64/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl b/arch/ia64/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl
> index 6b64f60..1f42b60 100644
> --- a/arch/ia64/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl
> +++ b/arch/ia64/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl
> @@ -335,3 +335,19 @@
> 323 common copy_file_range sys_copy_file_range
> 324 common preadv2 sys_preadv2
> 325 common pwritev2 sys_pwritev2
> +# perf_event_open requires an architecture specific implementation
> +326 common perf_event_open sys_perf_event_open
> +# seccomp requires an architecture specific implementation
> +327 common seccomp sys_seccomp
I don't think that's correct for these two. perf_event_open() of
course requires 'perf' support that ia64 does not have, but
at least seccomp should just work.
> +# pkey_mprotect requires an architecture specific implementation
> +328 common pkey_mprotect sys_pkey_mprotect
> +# pkey_alloc requires an architecture specific implementation
> +329 common pkey_alloc sys_pkey_alloc
> +# pkey_free requires an architecture specific implementation
> +330 common pkey_free sys_pkey_free
One comment for all pkey calls would be sufficient. More importantly
it requires hardware support that ia64 does not have AFAICT.
> +# statx requires an architecture specific implementation
> +331 common statx sys_statx
> +# io_pgetevents requires an architecture specific implementation
> +332 common io_pgetevents sys_io_pgetevents
It certainly does not require any support from the architecture for these.
> +# rseq requires an architecture specific implementation
> +333 common rseq sys_rseq
Maybe leave rseq and pkey_* commented out so we reserve
the number but don't add it for real? Maybe the ia64 maintainers
have a preference.
As asm-generic maintainer, I'd like to have the various asm/unistd.h
headers be as similar as possible and at least reserve all the
numbers even if we don't need the calls on a given architecture.
Arnd
