On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 8:10 AM Firoz Khan <firoz.khan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Oct 2018 at 01:48, Helge Deller <deller@xxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > * Firoz Khan <firoz.khan@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> > > System call table generation script must be run to generate
> > > unistd_32/64.h and syscall_table_32/64/c32.h files. This patch
> > > will have changes which will invokes the script.
> > >
> > > This patch will generate unistd_32/64.h and syscall_table_
> > > 32/64/c32.h files by the syscall table generation script
> > > invoked by arch/parisc/Makefile and the generated files against
> > > the removed files will be identical.
> > >
> > > The generated uapi header file will be included in uapi/asm/
> > > unistd_32/64.h and generated system call table support file will
> > > be included by arch/sparc/kernel/syscall_table_32/64.S file.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Firoz Khan <firoz.khan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > arch/parisc/Makefile | 4 +
> > > arch/parisc/include/asm/Kbuild | 3 +
> > > arch/parisc/include/uapi/asm/Kbuild | 2 +
> > > arch/parisc/include/uapi/asm/unistd.h | 373 +--------------------------
> > > arch/parisc/kernel/syscall.S | 12 +-
> > > arch/parisc/kernel/syscall_table.S | 459 ----------------------------------
> >
> >
> > Can we please get rid of those two new files:
>
> Yes, we don't need those files some of the architecture and other
> architecture does have same/similar files. That's why I added below
> files, so every architecture implementation looks same.
>
> I feel it is better to remove these files.
> Arnd, Do u have any comment on this?
I agree with Helge. This was a big different in a previous version where
you generated the syscall_table.S file from syscalls.tbl, but now that
you generade the syscall_table.h file instead, we no longer need to
keep the .S file synchronized across architectures.
Having a separate .S file would make it easier to replace that with
a .c file later, but it's also easier to split it out after your series than
as part of it.
Arnd
