Re: [PATCH v4 04/16] generic-sections: add section core helpers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 05:33:38PM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Aug 2016 23:38:44 -0700
> "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > > > Ah, thing is we use this for both linktables and section ranges.
> > > > > > Or do we want macros for both that do the same thing ?  
> > > > >
> > > > > I think it would make the code using it more readable.  
> > > >
> > > > Alrighty... so:
> > > >
> > > > LINKTABLE_START()
> > > > LINKTABLE_END()
> > > >
> > > > SECTION_RANGE_START()
> > > > SECTION_RANGE_END()
> > > >
> > > > And these macros do the exact same thing. Ie, nothing shared. Right?  
> > >
> > > Yeah I think so. Internally they would probably be aliased to the
> > > same common definition (unless you had some type check or something),
> > > but user would know about such details.  
> > 
> > What name should we use for such common macro definition ?
> 
> 
> Ah, not really sure. I guess the "link table" is some kind of
> section range? I haven't actually looked closely at both of them
> in the subsequent patches. It matters less if it's not expected
> to be used as an API though.
> 

OK well, going with LINUX_SECTION_START() so we'll have:

#define LINKTABLE_START		LINUX_SECTION_START
#define LINKTABLE_END		LINUX_SECTION_END

#define SECTION_RANGE_START	LINUX_SECTION_START
#define SECTION_RANGE_END	LINUX_SECTION_END

Is that OK?

  Luis
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux