* Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote: > So no, i don't think your patch is the real solution. [...] s/real/complete Note, your patch solves a real problem: the ratelimited WARN_ON()s should not be in the generic bug.h header, that's just broken. I just don't think this is the only problem: the other problem was what hid the bug in the first place, the spurious ratelimit.h inclusion via net.h. Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
