On 12/27/2010 12:43 PM, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > It would have been better to include cache.h and then use L1_CACHE_BYTES, > as the value differs for EV4. > It will work with 64 as this is the bigger of the two. > > It looks like we could do this for almost all archs. > But then I am not sure if "L1_CACHE_BYTES" is the same as > a cacheline on the different archs. > For x86, L1 is definitely not the right cache line to use, in terms of what matters for SMP sharing. And yes, there are x86's with smaller L1 than L2/3 cache line size. -hpa -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
