Re: start_kernel(): bug: interrupts were enabled early

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/31/2010 03:26 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> 
> Not by adding overhead to every single down_read()/down_write() just to
> fix a once-off startup problem - that's taking laziness way too far.
> 

How much overhead is this on non-x86 architectures (keep in mind x86
doesn't use this?)

	-hpa

-- 
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux