Re: start_kernel(): bug: interrupts were enabled early

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/31/2010 02:54 PM, Russell King wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 04:42:25PM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
>> Do not run the checks while we are in a single threaded context?
>>
>> I thought we had some dynamic code patching thingamy that could change
>> those when we go to smp mode?
> 
> You have to remember that on embedded architectures, such as ARM,
> where XIP is supported we can't change the text segment at run time -
> which means dynamic code patching won't work.
> 
> However, the kernel should still work in such situations.
> 

The question still remains what the incremental cost is of doing
irqsave/irqrestore.

	-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux