On Wed, 2010-03-31 at 15:49 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > But these things are all utterly gross. The bottom line is that > radix_tree_init() is manifestly unsuited to being called with local > interrupts disabled. 773e3eb7b81e5ba13b5155dfb3bb75b8ce37f8f9 was > just a wrong patch. Except that powerpc (and now it seems x86) both want to use radix trees for interrupt handling... At least on powerpc, we trick and use a linear search until the radix trees are initialized, which we do later during boot, but that somewhat sucks. I believe sherry picking things like not calling radix_tree_init() is going to fix one case today, until we have another one, and another one, and etc... I suspect we're better off fixing the root of the problem in down/up. Cheers, Ben. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
