On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 11:42:41AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > void __init lmb_init(void)
> > {
> > + lmb.memory.region = lmb_memory_region;
> > + lmb.memory.region_array_size = ARRAY_SIZE(lmb_memory_region);
> > + lmb.reserved.region = lmb_reserved_region;
> > + lmb.reserved.region_array_size = ARRAY_SIZE(lmb_reserved_region);
> > +
>
> That's rather unreadable and has random whitespace noise.
>
> Should be something like:
>
> lmb.memory.region = lmb_memory_region;
> lmb.memory.region_array_size = ARRAY_SIZE(lmb_memory_region);
> lmb.reserved.region = lmb_reserved_region;
> lmb.reserved.region_array_size = ARRAY_SIZE(lmb_reserved_region);
>
> also, i'd suggest to shorten region_array_size to region_size (we know it's an
> array), so it would become:
>
> lmb.memory.region = lmb_memory_region;
> lmb.memory.region_size = ARRAY_SIZE(lmb_memory_region);
>
I don't mean to be pedantic, but the LMB code already has a lot of
region.size references so region_size looks a bit awkward. All of the
accessors in linux/lmb.h use region_nr as the array index, so perhaps
nr_regions would be less ambiguous.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
