Re: [RFC PATCH -v3 1/2] lmb: seperate region array from lmb_region struct

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 23 Mar 2010, Yinghai Lu wrote:

> 
> lmb_init() connect them back.
> 
> also add region_array_size in lmb_region to tack the region array size.
> 
> -v3: seperate lmb core change to seperated patch
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> ---
>  include/linux/lmb.h |    5 ++++-
>  lib/lmb.c           |   11 ++++++++++-
>  2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/lmb.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/lmb.h
> +++ linux-2.6/include/linux/lmb.h
> @@ -26,7 +26,8 @@ struct lmb_property {
>  struct lmb_region {
>  	unsigned long cnt;
>  	u64 size;
> -	struct lmb_property region[MAX_LMB_REGIONS+1];
> +	struct lmb_property *region;
> +	unsigned long region_array_size;
>  };
>  
>  struct lmb {
> @@ -37,6 +38,8 @@ struct lmb {
>  };
>  
>  extern struct lmb lmb;
> +extern struct lmb_property lmb_memory_region[MAX_LMB_REGIONS + 1];
> +extern struct lmb_property lmb_reserved_region[MAX_LMB_REGIONS + 1];

Is there a reason why this needs to be exported ?

Thanks,

	tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux