Re: [patch 2/2] fix SMP data race in pagetable setup vs walking

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 5 May 2008 14:12:40 +0200

> I only converted x86 and powerpc. I think comments in x86 are good because
> that is more or less the reference implementation and is where many VM
> developers would look to understand mm/ code. Commenting all page table
> walking in all other architectures is kind of beyond my skill or patience,
> and maintainers might consider this weird "alpha thingy" is below them ;)
> But they are quite free to add smp_read_barrier_depends to their own code.
> 
> Still would like more acks on this before it is applied.

I've read this over a few times, I think it's OK:

Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux