[patch 1/2] read_barrier_depends fixlets

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



While considering the impact of read_barrier_depends, it occurred to
me that it should really be really a noop for the compiler. At least, it is
better to have every arch the same than to have a few that are slightly
different. (Does this mean SMP Alpha's read_barrier_depends could drop the
"memory" clobber too?)
--
It would be a highly unusual compiler that might try to issue a load of
data1 before it loads a data2 which is data-dependant on data1.

There is the problem of the compiler trying to reload data1 _after_
loading data2, and thus having a newer data1 than data2. However if the
compiler is so inclined, then it could perform such a load at any point
after the barrier, so the barrier itself will not guarantee correctness.

I think we've mostly hoped the compiler would not to do that.

This brings alpha and frv into line with all other architectures.

Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxx>

Index: linux-2.6/include/asm-alpha/barrier.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/include/asm-alpha/barrier.h
+++ linux-2.6/include/asm-alpha/barrier.h
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ __asm__ __volatile__("mb": : :"memory")
 #define smp_mb()	barrier()
 #define smp_rmb()	barrier()
 #define smp_wmb()	barrier()
-#define smp_read_barrier_depends()	barrier()
+#define smp_read_barrier_depends()	do { } while (0)
 #endif
 
 #define set_mb(var, value) \
Index: linux-2.6/include/asm-frv/system.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/include/asm-frv/system.h
+++ linux-2.6/include/asm-frv/system.h
@@ -179,7 +179,7 @@ do {							\
 #define mb()			asm volatile ("membar" : : :"memory")
 #define rmb()			asm volatile ("membar" : : :"memory")
 #define wmb()			asm volatile ("membar" : : :"memory")
-#define read_barrier_depends()	barrier()
+#define read_barrier_depends()	do { } while (0)
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
 #define smp_mb()			mb()
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux