On Wed, 7 Feb 2024 12:23:23 -0800 Joe Damato wrote: > > Unless you have a clear reason not to, I think using u32 would be more > > natural? If my head math is right the range for u32 is 4096 sec, > > slightly over an hour? I'd use u32 and limit it to S32_MAX. > > OK, that seems fine. Sorry for the noob question, but since that represents > a fucntional change to patch 4/4, I believe I would need to drop Jiri's > Reviewed-by, is that right? I'd default to keeping it. But the review tag retention rules are one of the more subjective things in kernel developments.
