On Wed, Feb 07, 2024 at 11:04:13AM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Mon, 5 Feb 2024 21:04:46 +0000 Joe Damato wrote: > > Allow busy polling on a per-epoll context basis. The per-epoll context > > usec timeout value is preferred, but the pre-existing system wide sysctl > > value is still supported if it specified. > > Why do we need u64 for usecs? I think u16 would do, and u32 would give > a very solid "engineering margin". If it was discussed in previous > versions I think it's worth explaining in the commit message. In patch 4/4 the value is limited to U32_MAX, but if you prefer I use a u32 here instead, I can make that change.
