On 10/15/2015 04:07 PM, Kees Cook wrote: > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 1:06 PM, Shuah Khan <shuahkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 10/15/2015 12:42 PM, Kees Cook wrote: >>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 7:07 AM, Shuah Khan <shuahkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> On 10/06/2015 01:30 PM, Kees Cook wrote: >>>>> Changing arm64 syscalls is done via a specific register set, more like s390 >>>>> than like arm (specific ptrace call) and x86 (part of general registers). >>>>> Since (restarting) poll doesn't exist on arm64, switch to using nanosleep >>>>> for testing restart_syscall. And since it looks like the syscall ABI is >>>>> inconsistent on arm-compat, so we must work around it (and document it) in >>>>> the test. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>> --- >>>>> v3: >>>>> - correctly set syscall number on native arm64. >>>>> v2: >>>>> - switch to nanosleep from a bad mix of poll and ppoll for testing restart. >>>>> --- >>>> >>>> Is this good to go? Failed to apply to linux-kselftest next. >>>> If you can rebase and resend. I can get this into 4.4-rc1 >>> >>> Yes please. :) >>> >> >> ok. Please rebase to linux-kselftest next and resend the patch. > > Am I looking at the right tree? linux-kselftest#next doesn't appear to > have the s390 patch that was included in 4.3. > I see what happened. Your patch is linux-next fixes and that went into 4.3-rc2. I can get linux-next rebase to 4.3-rc2 and get your patch in. Thanks for clearing this up. thanks, -- Shuah -- Shuah Khan Sr. Linux Kernel Developer Open Source Innovation Group Samsung Research America (Silicon Valley) shuahkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | (970) 217-8978 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-api" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
