On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 7:07 AM, Shuah Khan <shuahkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 10/06/2015 01:30 PM, Kees Cook wrote: >> Changing arm64 syscalls is done via a specific register set, more like s390 >> than like arm (specific ptrace call) and x86 (part of general registers). >> Since (restarting) poll doesn't exist on arm64, switch to using nanosleep >> for testing restart_syscall. And since it looks like the syscall ABI is >> inconsistent on arm-compat, so we must work around it (and document it) in >> the test. >> >> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> v3: >> - correctly set syscall number on native arm64. >> v2: >> - switch to nanosleep from a bad mix of poll and ppoll for testing restart. >> --- > > Is this good to go? Failed to apply to linux-kselftest next. > If you can rebase and resend. I can get this into 4.4-rc1 Yes please. :) Thanks! -Kees -- Kees Cook Chrome OS Security -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-api" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
