On 10/15/2015 12:42 PM, Kees Cook wrote: > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 7:07 AM, Shuah Khan <shuahkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 10/06/2015 01:30 PM, Kees Cook wrote: >>> Changing arm64 syscalls is done via a specific register set, more like s390 >>> than like arm (specific ptrace call) and x86 (part of general registers). >>> Since (restarting) poll doesn't exist on arm64, switch to using nanosleep >>> for testing restart_syscall. And since it looks like the syscall ABI is >>> inconsistent on arm-compat, so we must work around it (and document it) in >>> the test. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> v3: >>> - correctly set syscall number on native arm64. >>> v2: >>> - switch to nanosleep from a bad mix of poll and ppoll for testing restart. >>> --- >> >> Is this good to go? Failed to apply to linux-kselftest next. >> If you can rebase and resend. I can get this into 4.4-rc1 > > Yes please. :) > ok. Please rebase to linux-kselftest next and resend the patch. thanks, -- Shuah -- Shuah Khan Sr. Linux Kernel Developer Open Source Innovation Group Samsung Research America (Silicon Valley) shuahkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | (970) 217-8978 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-api" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
