On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 03:39:44AM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote: > Here are my improvements; hope that helps ... Yes, looks good, thanks!--b. > > Thanks, > Andreas > > diff --git a/fs/richacl_compat.c b/fs/richacl_compat.c > index 9b76fc0..21af9a0 100644 > --- a/fs/richacl_compat.c > +++ b/fs/richacl_compat.c > @@ -351,26 +351,26 @@ richacl_propagate_everyone(struct richacl_alloc *alloc) > struct richace *ace; > unsigned int owner_allow, group_allow; > > - /* > - * If the owner mask contains permissions which are not in the group > - * mask, the group mask contains permissions which are not in the other > - * mask, or the owner class contains permissions which are not in the > - * other mask, we may need to propagate permissions up from the > - * everyone@ allow ace. The third condition is implied by the first > - * two. > - */ > - if (!((acl->a_owner_mask & ~acl->a_group_mask) || > - (acl->a_group_mask & ~acl->a_other_mask))) > - return 0; > if (!acl->a_count) > return 0; > ace = acl->a_entries + acl->a_count - 1; > if (richace_is_inherit_only(ace) || !richace_is_everyone(ace)) > return 0; > > + /* > + * Permissions the owner and group class are granted through the > + * trailing everyone@ allow ace. > + */ > owner_allow = ace->e_mask & acl->a_owner_mask; > group_allow = ace->e_mask & acl->a_group_mask; > > + /* > + * If the group or other masks hide permissions which the owner should > + * be allowed, we need to propagate those permissions up. Otherwise, > + * those permissions may be lost when applying the other mask to the > + * trailing everyone@ allow ace, or when isolating the group class from > + * the other class through additional deny aces. > + */ > if (owner_allow & ~(acl->a_group_mask & acl->a_other_mask)) { > /* Propagate everyone@ permissions through to owner@. */ > who.e_id.special = RICHACE_OWNER_SPECIAL_ID; > @@ -379,6 +379,11 @@ richacl_propagate_everyone(struct richacl_alloc *alloc) > acl = alloc->acl; > } > > + /* > + * If the other mask hides permissions which the group class should be > + * allowed, we need to propagate those permissions up to the owning > + * group and to all other members in the group class. > + */ > if (group_allow & ~acl->a_other_mask) { > int n; > > @@ -399,16 +404,15 @@ richacl_propagate_everyone(struct richacl_alloc *alloc) > richace_is_owner(ace) || > richace_is_group(ace)) > continue; > - if (richace_is_allow(ace) || richace_is_deny(ace)) { > - /* > - * Any inserted entry will end up below the > - * current entry > - */ > - if (__richacl_propagate_everyone(alloc, ace, > - group_allow)) > - return -1; > - acl = alloc->acl; > - } > + > + /* > + * Any inserted entry will end up below the current > + * entry. > + */ > + if (__richacl_propagate_everyone(alloc, ace, > + group_allow)) > + return -1; > + acl = alloc->acl; > } > } > return 0; > -- > 2.4.3 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-api" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html