Hello, Petr. On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 03:03:43PM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote: > It enforces using kthread_worker_fn() for the main thread. But I doubt > that there are any plans to create any alternative. In fact, I think > that we do not want any alternative main thread because it would be > hard to support consistency with the rest of the kthread worker API. The original intention was allowing users to use a wrapper function which sets up kthread attributes and then calls kthread_worker_fn(). That can be done by a work item too but is more cumbersome. Just wanted to note that. Will keep reading on. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-api" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
