----- On Sep 17, 2015, at 9:13 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 06:27:10PM +0000, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: >> ----- On Sep 7, 2015, at 12:15 PM, Mathieu Desnoyers >> mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: >> >> > [ Untested on this architecture. To try it out: fetch linux-next/akpm, >> > apply this patch, build/run a membarrier-enabled kernel, and do make >> > kselftest. ] >> >> Hi, >> >> We tested the system call on our ARM board (Wandboard, SoC >> Freescale i.MX6 Quad) by applying this patch on top of >> Linux 4.3-rc1. Both the membarrier kselftest and >> Userspace RCU regression tests (the latter manually wired up >> on sys_membarrier) work fine. >> >> Tested-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> sys_membarrier has been pulled into Linux 4.3-rc1. Please >> feel free to wire it up on ARM. > > Well, it's not going to end up with 388, but 389, because we also have > userfaultfd added in the same merge window, and I follow the x86 > syscall ordering when adding to ARM. That's fine with me! Thanks, Mathieu > > -- > FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up > according to speedtest.net. -- Mathieu Desnoyers EfficiOS Inc. http://www.efficios.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-api" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
