On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 05:38:04PM +0100, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > ----- On Sep 16, 2015, at 12:35 PM, Will Deacon will.deacon@xxxxxxx wrote: > > > Hi Mathieu, > > > > On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 04:18:39PM +0100, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > >> ----- On Sep 7, 2015, at 12:15 PM, Mathieu Desnoyers > >> mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > >> > >> > arm64 sys_membarrier number is already wired for arm64 through > >> > asm-generic/unistd.h, but needs to be allocated separately for > >> > the 32-bit compability layer of arm64. > >> > > >> > [ Untested on this architecture. To try it out: fetch linux-next/akpm, > >> > apply this patch, build/run a membarrier-enabled kernel, and do make > >> > kselftest. ] > >> > >> sys_membarrier has been merged into Linux 4.3-rc1. sys_membarrier can therefore > >> be tested on top of Linus' master. > > > > Just to say that I'm happy to merge this once arch/arm/ also has the > > syscall wired up. It'd be a bit weird to have the support in the arm64 > > compat layer but not the arch/arm/ native kernel! > > Sounds good! We're currently testing sys_membarrier on a wandboard. We'll > provide feedback by replying to the ARM patch thread soon. Ok. I was about to kick the selftest on my Juno board (arm64). Will -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-api" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
