On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 9:54 PM, Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 10:10:12AM +1300, Michael Cree wrote: >> On 12/01/11 18:29, Matt Turner wrote: >>> On boot-up of my UP1500, I see >>> >>> HWRPB cycle frequency bogus. Estimated 796423805 Hz >>> Trying to install interrupt handler for IRQ8 >>> ------------[ cut here ]------------ >>> WARNING: at kernel/softirq.c:138 __local_bh_enable+0xa8/0xc0() >> >> I don't think that's related to the __do_IRQ removal. It occurs in the >> 2.6.37 kernel just released. Was discussed on linux-alpha with no >> resolution; see >> http://marc.info/?l=linux-alpha&m=128859282018188&w=2 and following >> messages in thread. > > Fixed, the patch will follow shortly. > >>> Ivan, the last patch in my tree is a breakage fix that you proposed. >>> It seems fine to me; can you please give your sign-off? >> >> The commit message should give more information. How about the following? >> >> Commit df9ee29270 made arch_local_irq_save and arch_local_irq_restore >> static inline which with -Werror trips up on __set_hae() and _set_hae() >> which are extern inline. The naive solution is to make __set_hae() and >> set_hae() static inline but for reasons described in commit d559d4a24a3fe >> this breaks the generic kernel build. Instead, since this is architecture >> specific code, this patch hard wires in the architecture specific method of >> disabling and enabling interrupts. > > Agreed, that would be nice description. > >> You can also add my Tested-by (I tested on generic, miata and dp264 kernel >> builds). > > Matt, feel free to add > Signed-off-by: Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Ivan. Thanks Ivan! I've updated this patch with your tag. Matt -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-alpha" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
