On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 10:17 AM Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi, > > On 1/5/21 6:18 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 9:58 PM Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > <snip> > > >> Patch 1/2 does use a slightly different approach then I suggest above, > >> thinking more about this it would be cleaner IMHO to just pass the > >> cur_profile pointer to the callbacks as the pseudo-code patch which I > >> wrote above does. Drivers which use globals can then just ignore > >> the extra argument (and keep the platform_profile_handler struct const) > >> where as drivers which use dynamic allocation can embed the struct in > >> their driver's data-struct. > > > > Agreed. > > Note that Jiaxun has provided a v2 of this patch-set with patch 1/2 implementing > the new approach. > > Can you merge merge that patch please and then once you're happy that this > has seen enough exposure in -next, provide me with an immutable branch with > the 3 platform-profile patches in it ? I will, thanks!
