On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 3:36 PM Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi, > > On 1/1/21 1:56 PM, Jiaxun Yang wrote: > > Tested on Lenovo Yoga-14SARE Chinese Edition. > > > > Jiaxun Yang (2): > > ACPI: platform-profile: Introduce data parameter to handler > > platform/x86: ideapad-laptop: DYTC Platform profile support > > > > drivers/acpi/platform_profile.c | 4 +- > > drivers/platform/x86/Kconfig | 1 + > > drivers/platform/x86/ideapad-laptop.c | 281 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > include/linux/platform_profile.h | 5 +- > > 4 files changed, 287 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > Thank you for your series, unfortunately the > "ACPI: platform-profile: Introduce data parameter to handler" > patch causes a conflict with the pending: > "[PATCH v8 3/3] platform/x86: thinkpad_acpi: Add platform profile support" > patch. > > But I do agree that adding that data parameter makes sense, so > it might be best to merge: > > "ACPI: platform-profile: Introduce data parameter to handler" > > First and then rebase the thinkpad_acpi patch on top. > > Rafael, do you think you could add: > > "ACPI: platform-profile: Introduce data parameter to handler" > > To the 2 ACPI: platform-profile patches which you already have pending for 5.11-rc# ? I'm not sure why that patch is needed at all, because whoever registers a platform profile handler needs to have access to the original handler object anyway. Also, on a somewhat related note, I'm afraid that it may not be a good idea to push this series for 5.11-rc in the face of recent objections against new material going in after the merge window. Cheers!
