Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] ACPI / bus: Do not traverse through non-existed device table

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 2018-02-04 at 08:18 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 9:45 PM, Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2018-02-01 at 22:40 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2018-02-01 at 15:32 -0500, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> > > > On 2/1/2018 3:20 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > > When __acpi_match_device() is called it would be possible to
> > > > > have
> > > > > ACPI ID table a MULL pointer. To avoid potential dereference,
> > > > 
> > > > NULL
> > > 
> > > Thanks, will fix later.
> > > 
> > > > Why not bail out here immediately if ids is null?
> > > 
> > > Because of the code which wasn't in context of this patch.
> > > 
> > > See also patch 1 in the series.
> > > 
> > > It's about how acpi_driver_match_device() uses it.
> > 
> > Btw, it makes device_get_match_data() to work properly on PRP0001
> > kind
> > of devices.
> 
> Maybe combine this one with the [1/6] then, it would make it somewhat
> easier to follow what's going on.

Sure, I will fold in.

-- 
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Intel Finland Oy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux