On Thu, 2018-02-01 at 15:32 -0500, Sinan Kaya wrote: > On 2/1/2018 3:20 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > When __acpi_match_device() is called it would be possible to have > > ACPI ID table a MULL pointer. To avoid potential dereference, > > NULL Thanks, will fix later. > Why not bail out here immediately if ids is null? Because of the code which wasn't in context of this patch. See also patch 1 in the series. It's about how acpi_driver_match_device() uses it. -- Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Intel Finland Oy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
