On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 9:45 PM, Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 2018-02-01 at 22:40 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >> On Thu, 2018-02-01 at 15:32 -0500, Sinan Kaya wrote: >> > On 2/1/2018 3:20 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >> > > When __acpi_match_device() is called it would be possible to have >> > > ACPI ID table a MULL pointer. To avoid potential dereference, >> > >> > NULL >> >> Thanks, will fix later. >> >> > Why not bail out here immediately if ids is null? >> >> Because of the code which wasn't in context of this patch. >> >> See also patch 1 in the series. >> >> It's about how acpi_driver_match_device() uses it. > > Btw, it makes device_get_match_data() to work properly on PRP0001 kind > of devices. Maybe combine this one with the [1/6] then, it would make it somewhat easier to follow what's going on. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
