On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 6:30 PM, Sajjan, Vikas C <vikas.cha.sajjan@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Rafael, > > -----Original Message----- > From: rjwysocki@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:rjwysocki@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Rafael J. Wysocki > Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2017 10:51 PM > To: Sajjan, Vikas C <vikas.cha.sajjan@xxxxxxx> > Cc: Linux PM <linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Seunghun Han <kkamagui@xxxxxxxxx>; Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>; Lakshminarasimha, Sunil Vishwanathpur <sunil.vl@xxxxxxx>; Attar, Abdul Lateef <abdul-lateef.attar@xxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/acpi: Fix improper handling of SCI INT for platforms supporting only IOAPIC mode > > On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 10:38 AM, Vikas C Sajjan <vikas.cha.sajjan@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> The platforms which support only IOAPIC mode and whose SCI INT is >> greater than 16, passes SCI INT via FADT and not via MADT int src >> override structure. In such cases current logic fails to handle it and >> throws error "Invalid bus_irq %u for legacy override". This patch >> handles the above mentioned case. While at it, also modify function >> mp_override_legacy_irq() to use the newly introduced function mp_register_ioapic_irq(). > > Actually, is it necessary to make this extra change here? > > How complicated would it be to separate it out? > > I can move these extra changes into a separate patch and keep only the fix in this patch. That would be useful I think in case someone wants to backport your fix, for example. Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
