Hi Rafael, -----Original Message----- From: rjwysocki@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:rjwysocki@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Rafael J. Wysocki Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2017 10:51 PM To: Sajjan, Vikas C <vikas.cha.sajjan@xxxxxxx> Cc: Linux PM <linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Seunghun Han <kkamagui@xxxxxxxxx>; Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>; Lakshminarasimha, Sunil Vishwanathpur <sunil.vl@xxxxxxx>; Attar, Abdul Lateef <abdul-lateef.attar@xxxxxxx> Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/acpi: Fix improper handling of SCI INT for platforms supporting only IOAPIC mode On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 10:38 AM, Vikas C Sajjan <vikas.cha.sajjan@xxxxxxx> wrote: > The platforms which support only IOAPIC mode and whose SCI INT is > greater than 16, passes SCI INT via FADT and not via MADT int src > override structure. In such cases current logic fails to handle it and > throws error "Invalid bus_irq %u for legacy override". This patch > handles the above mentioned case. While at it, also modify function > mp_override_legacy_irq() to use the newly introduced function mp_register_ioapic_irq(). Actually, is it necessary to make this extra change here? How complicated would it be to separate it out? I can move these extra changes into a separate patch and keep only the fix in this patch. Thanks, Rafael Thanks, Vikas Sajjan ��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{�����ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f
