On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 02:48:51PM -0500, Jeremy Linton wrote: > Now that we have a PPTT parser, in preparation for its use > on arm64, lets build it. > > Signed-off-by: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@xxxxxxx> > --- > arch/arm64/Kconfig | 1 + > drivers/acpi/Makefile | 1 + > drivers/acpi/arm64/Kconfig | 3 +++ > 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig > index 0df64a6a56d4..68c9d1289735 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig > +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig > @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ config ARM64 > select ACPI_REDUCED_HARDWARE_ONLY if ACPI > select ACPI_MCFG if ACPI > select ACPI_SPCR_TABLE if ACPI > + select ACPI_PPTT if ACPI > select ARCH_CLOCKSOURCE_DATA > select ARCH_HAS_DEBUG_VIRTUAL > select ARCH_HAS_DEVMEM_IS_ALLOWED > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/Makefile b/drivers/acpi/Makefile > index 90265ab4437a..c92a0c937551 100644 > --- a/drivers/acpi/Makefile > +++ b/drivers/acpi/Makefile > @@ -85,6 +85,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI_BGRT) += bgrt.o > obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI_CPPC_LIB) += cppc_acpi.o > obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI_SPCR_TABLE) += spcr.o > obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI_DEBUGGER_USER) += acpi_dbg.o > +obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI_PPTT) += pptt.o > > # processor has its own "processor." module_param namespace > processor-y := processor_driver.o > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/arm64/Kconfig b/drivers/acpi/arm64/Kconfig > index 5a6f80fce0d6..74b855a669ea 100644 > --- a/drivers/acpi/arm64/Kconfig > +++ b/drivers/acpi/arm64/Kconfig > @@ -7,3 +7,6 @@ config ACPI_IORT > > config ACPI_GTDT > bool > + > +config ACPI_PPTT > + bool > \ No newline at end of file I do not understand the logic. Why should we have a Kconfig option in drivers/acpi/arm64 for code in drivers/acpi ? AFAIK PPTT is not an ACPI ARM64 specific binding. Lorenzo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
