On Sat, Oct 07, 2017 at 02:31:05AM +0200, Marcel Holtmann wrote: > Hi Rafael, > > >>>> This patch allows SerDev module to manage serial devices declared as > >>>> attached to an UART in ACPI table. > >>>> > >>>> acpi_serdev_add_device() callback will only take into account entries > >>>> without enumerated flag set. This flags is set for all entries during > >>>> ACPI scan, except for SPI and I2C serial devices, and for UART with > >>>> 2nd patch in the series. > >>>> > >>>> Signed-off-by: Frédéric Danis <frederic.danis.oss@xxxxxxxxx> > >>>> --- > >>>> drivers/tty/serdev/core.c | 99 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- > >>>> 1 file changed, 94 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > >>> > >>> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> > >> so how do we get these changes upstream? If the serdev changes alone do not cause any harm, I am almost proposing taking them through bluetooth-next tree and only leave only the ACPI change to the ACPI maintainers. > > > > That would be fine by me. I can take the serdev patch too, though. > > having both patches go via ACPI tree might be simplest. Greg, any objections from you? None from me, let me go ack the serdev patch... thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
