On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 5:01 PM, Kani, Toshimitsu <toshi.kani@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > --- a/drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c
>> > @@ -1031,7 +1031,7 @@ static ssize_t scrub_store(struct device *dev,
>> > if (nd_desc) {
>> > struct acpi_nfit_desc *acpi_desc = to_acpi_desc(nd_desc);
>> >
>> > - rc = acpi_nfit_ars_rescan(acpi_desc);
>> > + rc = acpi_nfit_ars_rescan(acpi_desc, 0);
>> > }
>> > device_unlock(dev);
>> > if (rc)
>> > @@ -2057,6 +2057,10 @@ static int ars_start(struct acpi_nfit_desc
>> *acpi_desc, struct nfit_spa *nfit_spa
>> > ars_start.type = ND_ARS_VOLATILE;
>> > else
>> > return -ENOTTY;
>> > + if (nfit_spa->ars_prev_data) {
>> > + ars_start.flags |= ND_ARS_RETURN_PREV_DATA;
>> > + nfit_spa->ars_prev_data = 0;
>> > + }
>>
>> I'd rather you plumb a new 'flags' parameter all the way through from
>> acpi_nfit_ars_rescan() to ars_start() rather than carrying this as a
>> property of nfit_spa.
>
> Yes, I wanted to carry 'flags' all the way, but since acpi_nfit_ars_rescan()
> calls acpi_nfit_scrub() via acpi_desc->work, all info needs to be marshalled
> into struct acpi_nfit_desc. Using nfit_spa allows a request to be carried as
> per-spa basis...
Ah ok, but I still think it does not belong to a spa. This is control
/ context information for the workqueue and that belongs with
acpi_nfit_desc. It think it's fine if all spas get re-scrubbed with
the "prev_data" flag in the the notification case.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
