On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 11:50 AM, Joerg Roedel <jroedel@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 02:06:44AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> The main problem is that representing anything hot-removable as a >> platform device is inherently fragile, as the platform bus type has no >> idea whatever about things that may physically go away and platform >> drivers don't expect that devices may vanish from under them in >> general and so on. Unregistration alone doesn't help much with that, >> so IMO at least for now it's better to avoid using platform_device for >> hot-removable stuff. > > Okay, thanks for the explanation. So patch 2 could be dropped, should I > resend without that patch or do you want to pick them up from this post? I can pick them up easily enough, thanks! Take care, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
