Hi Rafael,
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 06:42:39PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, March 22, 2017 06:33:25 PM Joerg Roedel wrote:
> > From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@xxxxxxx>
> >
> > No platform-device is required for IO(x)APICs, so don't even
> > create them.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@xxxxxxx>
>
> If we do this, I'd prefer not to do [2/3], because we'll introduce code that
> will be essentially dead then.
In this case the code in acpi_bus_attach() adding platform_devices is also
dead. Could it be removed then?
>
> > ---
> > drivers/acpi/acpi_platform.c | 8 +++++---
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_platform.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_platform.c
> > index b4c1a6a..03250e1 100644
> > --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_platform.c
> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_platform.c
> > @@ -25,9 +25,11 @@
> > ACPI_MODULE_NAME("platform");
> >
> > static const struct acpi_device_id forbidden_id_list[] = {
> > - {"PNP0000", 0}, /* PIC */
> > - {"PNP0100", 0}, /* Timer */
> > - {"PNP0200", 0}, /* AT DMA Controller */
>
> Why do you change the existing entries?
Just to align the '0's in one column :)
Joerg
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
