On 16/02/2017 10:46, Sanil Kumar wrote: > On 2/16/2017 3:11 PM, Ding Tianhong wrote: >> >> On 2017/2/16 17:32, Alexander Graf wrote: >>> >>> On 16/02/2017 10:14, Daniel Lezcano wrote: >>>> On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 09:42:11AM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote: >>>> >>>> [ ... ] >>>> >>>>>>>> I believe Marc is looking at some rework in this area which may >>>>>>>> enable >>>>>>>> this, so please wait for that to appear. >>>>>>> Yeah, I'm implementing a semi-flexible way to add new quirk >>>>>>> types, and >>>>>>> the last thing I want to see is two (or more) tables describing >>>>>>> the same >>>>>>> thing. >>>>>> Kindly ping, if you have patches in hand, I can test against our >>>>>> platforms, >>>>>> thank you very much. >>>>> Any progress on this? I'm not a big fan of stalling erratum fixes >>>>> upstream >>>>> because of potential future refactoring. >>>> The fix is in the tip tree, soon in v4.11-rc1 when the merge will be >>>> finished. >>>> >>>> http://goo.gl/x90qwE >>>> http://goo.gl/asCBBD >>> Oh, I missed that. Sorry for the fuss :). >>> >>> >>> Alex >>> >> Hi, I thinks the tip tree is only applied the erratum for DT, not for >> ACPI, the patch >> for ACPI is not applied yet, so the work isn't finished. ：） > Yes, initial thread was about ACPI part. I think Alex was asking about > that. Ah yes. Indeed. Thanks. -- <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook | <http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter | <http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
