Hi Daniel, On 2017/2/16 17:14, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 09:42:11AM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote: > > [ ... ] > >>>>> I believe Marc is looking at some rework in this area which may enable >>>>> this, so please wait for that to appear. >>>> Yeah, I'm implementing a semi-flexible way to add new quirk types, and >>>> the last thing I want to see is two (or more) tables describing the same >>>> thing. >>> Kindly ping, if you have patches in hand, I can test against our platforms, >>> thank you very much. >> Any progress on this? I'm not a big fan of stalling erratum fixes upstream >> because of potential future refactoring. > The fix is in the tip tree, soon in v4.11-rc1 when the merge will be finished. > > http://goo.gl/x90qwE > http://goo.gl/asCBBD I think it's the erratum core code and the device tree support are merged by you, not the ACPI support in this patch set, did I miss something? Thanks Hanjun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
