On 2017/2/16 17:32, Alexander Graf wrote: > > > On 16/02/2017 10:14, Daniel Lezcano wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 09:42:11AM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote: >> >> [ ... ] >> >>>>>> I believe Marc is looking at some rework in this area which may enable >>>>>> this, so please wait for that to appear. >>>>> Yeah, I'm implementing a semi-flexible way to add new quirk types, and >>>>> the last thing I want to see is two (or more) tables describing the same >>>>> thing. >>>> >>>> Kindly ping, if you have patches in hand, I can test against our platforms, >>>> thank you very much. >>> >>> Any progress on this? I'm not a big fan of stalling erratum fixes upstream >>> because of potential future refactoring. >> >> The fix is in the tip tree, soon in v4.11-rc1 when the merge will be finished. >> >> http://goo.gl/x90qwE >> http://goo.gl/asCBBD > > Oh, I missed that. Sorry for the fuss :). > > > Alex > Hi, I thinks the tip tree is only applied the erratum for DT, not for ACPI, the patch for ACPI is not applied yet, so the work isn't finished. o<o< Thanks Ding > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel > > . > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
