Re: [PATCH V2] acpi, pci, irq: account for early penalty assignment

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Bjorn,

On 3/8/2016 2:04 PM, Sinan Kaya wrote:
>>> The point here is that a PCI Interrupt Link can only use an IRQ that
>>> >> is level-triggered, active low.  If an IRQ is already set to any other
>>> >> state, whether for an ISA device or for an active-high SCI, we can't
>>> >> use it for a PCI Interrupt Link.
> Unfortunately, this still doesn't hold. 
> 
> A patch is long overdue for this series. I'll post v3. We can go from there.

I just posted a new series and changed the title. Let's continue the discussion there.

[PATCH 1/4] acpi,pci,irq: reduce resource requirements
...

-- 
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux