On 3/3/2016 10:10 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > That was my idea, but your minimal patch from last night looks awfully > attractive, and maybe it's not worth moving it to arch/x86. I do think we > could simplify the code significantly by getting rid of the kzalloc and > acpi_irq_penalty_list from acpi_irq_set_penalty(). How about pushing on > that a little bit first, and see what it looks like then? OK. Let me go that direction. -- Sinan Kaya Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
