On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 12:39:15PM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2014 12:39:15 -0300 > From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@xxxxxxxxxxx> > To: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: "Chen, Gong" <gong.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx, > arozansk@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] trace, RAS: Add basic RAS trace event > X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.3 (GTK+ 2.24.22; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) > > Em Thu, 06 Mar 2014 16:26:33 +0100 > Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx> escreveu: > > > On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 10:06:53AM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > > > For example PCIe and memory errors are not x86-specific. Also, as ACPI > > > may also be used on ARM, we may also start to have APEI errors there: > > > https://lwn.net/Articles/574439/ > > > https://wiki.linaro.org/LEG/Engineering/Kernel/ACPI > > > > > > So, better to think on that on a long term. > > > > kernel/ras/ could also be used in that case but I guess drivers/ras/ is > > fine too. > > Both work for me, although drivers/ras seems more adequate, IMHO, > as I expect that we'll have there both subsystem code and drivers. > OK, I will move this trace stub to drivers/ras in next version. BTW, any other comments for 2nd patch? I thought Mauro will have some comments for that patch. :-)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
