On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 10:06:53AM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > For example PCIe and memory errors are not x86-specific. Also, as ACPI > may also be used on ARM, we may also start to have APEI errors there: > https://lwn.net/Articles/574439/ > https://wiki.linaro.org/LEG/Engineering/Kernel/ACPI > > So, better to think on that on a long term. kernel/ras/ could also be used in that case but I guess drivers/ras/ is fine too. > In order to put all RAS drivers under the same place. We may > eventually have a subdir there for EDAC, and one per RAS report > mechanism, in order to keep it cleaner. That doesn't bring any advantages - edac drivers are just fine in drivers/edac/. And without benefits for a move, it would be a senseless code churn only. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine. -- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
