Re: [PATCH] ACPI: Flag use of ACPI and ACPI idioms for power supplies to regulator API

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tuesday, January 28, 2014 12:21:06 PM Mark Brown wrote:
> 
> --XsQoSWH+UP9D9v3l
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Disposition: inline
> 
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 01:06:45AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Monday, January 27, 2014 01:21:06 PM Mark Brown wrote:
> 
> > > I'd like someone to take it :) .  I'd expected the default thing would
> > > be for it to go via the ACPI tree but I can apply it to the regulator
> > > tree if you'd prefer, either way is fine by me.
> 
> > I've queued it up for my next pull request, thanks!
> 
> Excellent, thanks!  Could you tag it for stable please as Jean
> requested?  In v3.13 it fixes regressions in lm90 on PCs if the
> regulator API is enabled (which unfortunately Ubuntu did so it's
> a real scenario) and it should be safe in older kernels though I'm
> not aware of any actual systems that are affected.

Done, thanks!

-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux