Re: [PATCH] ACPI: Flag use of ACPI and ACPI idioms for power supplies to regulator API

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Monday, January 27, 2014 01:21:06 PM Mark Brown wrote:
> 
> --fzoBs0edN2XpEQF6
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Disposition: inline
> 
> On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 01:54:48PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Monday, January 27, 2014 12:44:34 AM Mark Brown wrote:
> 
> > > > That's going to be called earlier than it use to be in 3.13 and before.
> 
> > > > No problems with that?
> 
> > > All that function does is to set a flag - so long as we can assign to a
> > > static variable it should be OK.
> 
> > OK, do you want me to take it?
> 
> I'd like someone to take it :) .  I'd expected the default thing would
> be for it to go via the ACPI tree but I can apply it to the regulator
> tree if you'd prefer, either way is fine by me.

I've queued it up for my next pull request, thanks!

-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux