On Mon, 27 Jan 2014, Jiang Liu wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
> index c9311be..c29c2c3 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
> @@ -261,7 +261,7 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_info(struct acpi_device *device)
>
> apic_id = acpi_get_apicid(pr->handle, device_declaration, pr->acpi_id);
> if (apic_id < 0) {
> - acpi_handle_err(pr->handle, "failed to get CPU APIC ID.\n");
> + acpi_handle_debug(pr->handle, "failed to get CPU APIC ID.\n");
> return -ENODEV;
> }
Don't we already leave some artifact in the kernel log at boot about apic
ids that don't get registered? I'm wondering if we should have this
warning at all.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
