On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 01:06:45AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Monday, January 27, 2014 01:21:06 PM Mark Brown wrote: > > I'd like someone to take it :) . I'd expected the default thing would > > be for it to go via the ACPI tree but I can apply it to the regulator > > tree if you'd prefer, either way is fine by me. > I've queued it up for my next pull request, thanks! Excellent, thanks! Could you tag it for stable please as Jean requested? In v3.13 it fixes regressions in lm90 on PCs if the regulator API is enabled (which unfortunately Ubuntu did so it's a real scenario) and it should be safe in older kernels though I'm not aware of any actual systems that are affected.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
