On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 04:51:40PM +0000, One Thousand Gnomes wrote: > On Wed, 4 Dec 2013 00:36:47 +0800 > Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > _PDC related stuff in processor_core.c is little bit X86/IA64 dependent, > > rework the code to make it more arch-independent. > > > > The return value of acpi_processor_eval_pdc() should be 'acpi_status' but > > defined as 'int', fix it too. > > Why not just define boot_options_idle_override as well. Then you can > leave the code unchanged. Also more importantly you can have override > values for ARM when it turns out you need those too and the logic will be > the same for both processor families The arguments to _PDC are architecture specific, so there do need to be code changes here. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
