Re: [RFC part1 PATCH 3/7] ACPI / processor_core: Rework _PDC related stuff to make it more arch-independent

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2013年12月04日 00:51, One Thousand Gnomes wrote:
On Wed,  4 Dec 2013 00:36:47 +0800
Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

_PDC related stuff in processor_core.c is little bit X86/IA64 dependent,
rework the code to make it more arch-independent.

The return value of acpi_processor_eval_pdc() should be 'acpi_status' but
defined as 'int', fix it too.
Why not just define boot_options_idle_override as well. Then you can
leave the code unchanged. Also more importantly you can have override
values for ARM when it turns out you need those too and the logic will be
the same for both processor families

There is a platform dependent head file such as pdc_intel.h which contains
some macros, some of those macros are used in arch-independent file processor_core.c,
that's why I posted this patch.

Thanks
Hanjun

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux